ATI FireGL X3-256 vs Quadro M1000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking529not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.75no data
Power efficiency12.79no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameGM107R420
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date18 August 2015 (9 years ago)3 August 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$200.89 $1,099

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed993 MHz491 MHz
Boost clock speed1072 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt57 Watt
Texture fill rate31.785.892
Floating-point processing power1.017 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1612
TMUs3212

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB/4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz454 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s29.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX129.0b (9_2)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 August 2015 3 August 2004
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB/4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 57 Watt

M1000M has an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 42.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M1000M and FireGL X3-256. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro M1000M is a mobile workstation card while FireGL X3-256 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Quadro M1000M
ATI FireGL X3-256
FireGL X3-256

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 539 votes

Rate Quadro M1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FireGL X3-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.