Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Quadro M1000M

Place in the ranking	536	90
Place by popularity	not in top-100	54
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.17	45.80
Power efficiency	12.74	13.12
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GM107	Navi 10
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	18 August 2015 (9 years ago)	7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$200.89	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5700 XT has 998% better value for money than M1000M.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	2560
Core clock speed	993 MHz	1605 MHz
Boost clock speed	1072 MHz	1905 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	31.78	304.8
Floating-point processing power	1.017 TFLOPS	9.754 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	64
TMUs	32	160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	272 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB/4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
VR Ready	no data	+
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data
Multi Monitor	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	+	+
CUDA	5.0	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M1000M 7.40

RX 5700 XT 42.87
+479%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M1000M 2844

RX 5700 XT 16482
+480%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

M1000M 4230

RX 5700 XT 35823
+747%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

M1000M 3498

RX 5700 XT 26189
+649%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

M1000M 23422

RX 5700 XT 146093
+524%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

M1000M 31

RX 5700 XT 115
+276%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

M1000M 59

RX 5700 XT 110
+85.2%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

M1000M 31

RX 5700 XT 43
+38.6%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

M1000M 37

RX 5700 XT 174
+365%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

M1000M 34

RX 5700 XT 81
+139%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

M1000M 12

RX 5700 XT 47
+291%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

M1000M 20

RX 5700 XT 141
+591%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

M1000M 2

RX 5700 XT 13
+647%

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

M1000M 20

RX 5700 XT 138
+575%

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

M1000M 37

RX 5700 XT 159
+325%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	39 −226%	127 +226%
1440p	12−14 −533%	76 +533%
4K	16 −200%	48 +200%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	5.15 −64%	3.14 +64%
1440p	16.74 −219%	5.25 +219%
4K	12.56 −51%	8.31 +51%

RX 5700 XT has 64% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 5700 XT has 219% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 5700 XT has 51% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −520%	93 +520%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −420%	78 +420%
Elden Ring	20−22 −565%	133 +565%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −288%	93 +288%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −407%	76 +407%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −447%	82 +447%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −680%	234 +680%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −721%	156 +721%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −448%	115 +448%
Valorant	24−27 −692%	190 +692%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −708%	194 +708%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −327%	64 +327%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −380%	72 +380%
Dota 2	24−27 −388%	127 +388%
Elden Ring	20−22 −685%	157 +685%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −72.7%	57 +72.7%
Fortnite	40−45 −314%	180−190 +314%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −543%	193 +543%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −458%	145 +458%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −484%	111 +484%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 −310%	246 +310%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −214%	66 +214%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −574%	150−160 +574%
Valorant	24−27 −367%	112 +367%
World of Tanks	110−120 −147%	270−280 +147%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −238%	81 +238%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −280%	57 +280%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −320%	63 +320%
Dota 2	24−27 −296%	103 +296%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −206%	100−110 +206%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −470%	171 +470%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 −245%	200−210 +245%
Valorant	24−27 −563%	159 +563%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	8−9 −888%	79 +888%
Elden Ring	10−11 −780%	88 +780%
Grand Theft Auto V	8−9 −888%	79 +888%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −349%	170−180 +349%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −600%	42 +600%
World of Tanks	50−55 −411%	270−280 +411%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −515%	80 +515%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −260%	36 +260%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −680%	39 +680%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −820%	130−140 +820%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −750%	119 +750%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −845%	104 +845%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −756%	75−80 +756%
Valorant	18−20 −526%	119 +526%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2 −2700%	28 +2700%
Dota 2	18−20 −339%	79 +339%
Elden Ring	4−5 −875%	39 +875%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −339%	79 +339%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −1067%	35 +1067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −586%	144 +586%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −440%	27 +440%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −339%	79 +339%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −767%	52 +767%
Counter-Strike 2	1−2 −4400%	45−50 +4400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −750%	17 +750%
Dota 2	18−20 −417%	93 +417%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −633%	65−70 +633%
Fortnite	7−8 −800%	60−65 +800%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −788%	71 +788%
Valorant	7−8 −786%	62 +786%

This is how M1000M and RX 5700 XT compete in popular games:

RX 5700 XT is 226% faster in 1080p
RX 5700 XT is 533% faster in 1440p
RX 5700 XT is 200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5700 XT is 4400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 5700 XT surpassed M1000M in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.40	42.87
Recency	18 August 2015	7 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB/4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	225 Watt

M1000M has 462.5% lower power consumption.

RX 5700 XT, on the other hand, has a 479.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M1000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M1000M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 5700 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.