Quadro M2000M: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

Quadro M2000M provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 8.96% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 4090.

Summary

NVIDIA started Quadro M2000M sales 3 December 2015. This is a Maxwell architecture notebook card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 4 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 1.25 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 80 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is a graphics card attached via MXM-A (3.0) interface. Power consumption is at 55 Watt.

Primary details

Some basic facts about Quadro M2000M: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in the ranking487
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Power efficiency11.17of 100.00 (Radeon 890M)
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGM107
Market segmentMobile workstation
Release date3 December 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Quadro M2000M's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro M2000M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640of 21760 (GeForce RTX 5090)
Core clock speed1029 MHzof 2670 MHz (Arc B580)
Boost clock speed1098 MHzof 3599 MHz (Radeon RX 7990 XTX)
Number of transistors1,870 millionof 208,000 million (B200 SXM 192 GB)
Manufacturing process technology28 nmof 3 nm (Arc Graphics 140V)
Power consumption (TDP)55 Wattof 2400 Watt (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate43.92of 2,554 (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Floating-point processing power1.405 TFLOPSof 109.7 (GeForce RTX 5090)
ROPs16of 192 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX)
TMUs40of 1280 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)

Form factor & compatibility

This section provides details about the physical dimensions of Quadro M2000M and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelarge
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M2000M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory typeGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GBof 294912 (Radeon Instinct MI325X)
Memory bus width128 Bitof 8192 Bit (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed1253 MHzof 20000 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile)
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sof 5,171 GB/s (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Shared memory-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M2000M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs
Display Port1.2

Supported technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M2000M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+
3D Vision Pro+
Mosaic+
nView Display Management+
Optimus+

API compatibility

APIs supported by Quadro M2000M, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX12
Shader Model5.1
OpenGL4.5of 4.6 (GeForce RTX 4090)
OpenCL1.2
Vulkan+
CUDA5.0

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of Quadro M2000M. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M2000M 8.96

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M2000M 3453

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

M2000M 5143

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

M2000M 20567

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

M2000M 4157

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

M2000M 29795

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

M2000M 9777

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

M2000M 9534

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

M2000M 10438

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

M2000M 53

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

M2000M 36

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

M2000M 70

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

M2000M 33

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

M2000M 46

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

M2000M 40

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 medical-01

M2000M 15

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

M2000M 22

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

M2000M 3

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

M2000M 22

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

M2000M 36

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

M2000M 46

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

M2000M 70

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

M2000M 33

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

M2000M 40

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

M2000M 15

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

M2000M 3.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Quadro M2000M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
4K12

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
Battlefield 5 27−30
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
Far Cry 5 21−24
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
Hitman 3 16−18
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
Metro Exodus 27−30
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
Battlefield 5 27−30
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
Far Cry 5 21−24
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
Hitman 3 16−18
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
Metro Exodus 27−30
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
Far Cry 5 21−24
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
Hitman 3 16−18
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
Far Cry 5 10−11
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
Hitman 3 12−14
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
Metro Exodus 12−14
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
Hitman 3 5−6
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
Metro Exodus 7−8
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
Far Cry 5 5−6
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10

Closest competitors

Quadro M2000M's performance relative to its closest rivals among mobile workstation graphics cards.


Quadro K2200M 100.11
Quadro M2000M 100
Quadro P600 96.09
Quadro M1200 93.86

AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Quadro M2000M is Radeon Pro 460, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 1 position in our ranking.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro M2000M:

Quadro M2000M 100

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with Quadro M2000M according to our statistics.

All comparisons with Quadro M2000M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


3.6 500 votes

Rate Quadro M2000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Quadro M2000M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.