Quadro M1000M vs GeForce GTX 860M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 860M with Quadro M1000M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 860M
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
7.91
+7%

GTX 860M outperforms M1000M by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking520535
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.03
Power efficiency7.2312.67
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGM107GM107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date13 January 2014 (10 years ago)18 August 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$200.89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152 or 640512
Core clock speed797 MHz993 MHz
Boost clock speed1085 MHz1072 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate43.4031.78
Floating-point processing power1.389 TFLOPS1.017 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB/4 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 2500 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.0 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
Display Portno data1.2
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus++
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA+5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 860M 7.91
+7%
M1000M 7.39

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 860M 3047
+7%
M1000M 2847

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 860M 4902
+15.9%
M1000M 4230

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 860M 3904
+11.6%
M1000M 3498

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 860M 27961
+19.4%
M1000M 23422

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 860M 10362
+21.6%
M1000M 8519

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 860M 10627
+33.5%
M1000M 7959

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 860M 11144
+31.6%
M1000M 8471

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

GTX 860M 50
+10.2%
M1000M 45

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

GTX 860M 30
+25%
M1000M 24

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

GTX 860M 23
M1000M 31
+31.9%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

GTX 860M 12
M1000M 59
+408%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

GTX 860M 2
M1000M 31
+1628%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

GTX 860M 15
M1000M 37
+146%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

GTX 860M 23
M1000M 34
+46.1%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

GTX 860M 7
M1000M 12
+84.6%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

GTX 860M 17
M1000M 20
+18.6%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

GTX 860M 9
+412%
M1000M 2

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

GTX 860M 17
M1000M 20
+18.6%

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

GTX 860M 23
M1000M 31
+31.9%

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

GTX 860M 15
M1000M 37
+146%

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

GTX 860M 12
M1000M 59
+407%

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

GTX 860M 2
M1000M 31
+1628%

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

GTX 860M 23
M1000M 34
+46.1%

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

GTX 860M 7
M1000M 12
+84.6%

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

GTX 860M 8.7
+412%
M1000M 1.7

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p91
+7.1%
85−90
−7.1%
Full HD36
−11.1%
40
+11.1%
4K13
+0%
13
+0%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.02
4Kno data15.45

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+6.1%
45−50
−6.1%
Hitman 3 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+4.7%
40−45
−4.7%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+10%
20−22
−10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+4%
24−27
−4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+6.1%
45−50
−6.1%
Hitman 3 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+4.7%
40−45
−4.7%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+10%
20−22
−10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+4%
24−27
−4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
−3.3%
62
+3.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+6.1%
45−50
−6.1%
Hitman 3 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+4.7%
40−45
−4.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+4%
24−27
−4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+9.1%
11
−9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+10%
20−22
−10%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Hitman 3 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+6.4%
45−50
−6.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hitman 3 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+12%
24−27
−12%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−40%
7
+40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

This is how GTX 860M and M1000M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 860M is 7% faster in 900p
  • M1000M is 11% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 860M is 50% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the M1000M is 40% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 860M is ahead in 51 test (71%)
  • M1000M is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 19 tests (26%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.91 7.39
Recency 13 January 2014 18 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB/4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 40 Watt

GTX 860M has a 7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

M1000M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 87.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 860M and Quadro M1000M.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 860M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M1000M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
GeForce GTX 860M
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Quadro M1000M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 449 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 860M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 551 vote

Rate Quadro M1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.