GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs Quadro K620M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K620M with GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K620M
2015
2 GB DDR3, 30 Watt
3.02

RTX 3070 Ti outperforms K620M by a whopping 1923% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking76832
Place by popularitynot in top-10071
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data52.56
Power efficiency6.9614.56
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGM108GA104
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2015 (9 years ago)31 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3846144
Core clock speed1029 MHz1575 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt290 Watt
Texture fill rate17.98339.8
Floating-point processing power0.8632 TFLOPS21.75 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs16192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1188 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s608.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K620M 3.02
RTX 3070 Ti 61.10
+1923%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K620M 1165
RTX 3070 Ti 23573
+1923%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro K620M 2434
RTX 3070 Ti 49760
+1944%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro K620M 7880
RTX 3070 Ti 120454
+1429%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro K620M 1621
RTX 3070 Ti 37663
+2223%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro K620M 9092
RTX 3070 Ti 208428
+2192%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
−776%
184
+776%
1440p4−5
−2350%
98
+2350%
4K3−4
−2100%
66
+2100%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.26
1440pno data6.11
4Kno data9.08

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2800%
174
+2800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1800%
171
+1800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−10700%
100−110
+10700%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−3800%
190−200
+3800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1514%
110−120
+1514%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2200%
138
+2200%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1767%
110−120
+1767%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1750%
140−150
+1750%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1325%
220−230
+1325%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1438%
120−130
+1438%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−896%
220−230
+896%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−3775%
150−160
+3775%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1571%
110−120
+1571%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1975%
240−250
+1975%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−282%
140−150
+282%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1311%
120−130
+1311%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−10700%
100−110
+10700%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−3800%
190−200
+3800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1514%
110−120
+1514%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1917%
121
+1917%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1767%
110−120
+1767%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1750%
140−150
+1750%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1325%
220−230
+1325%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1438%
120−130
+1438%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−896%
220−230
+896%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−3775%
150−160
+3775%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1571%
110−120
+1571%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−2533%
316
+2533%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−821%
120−130
+821%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−282%
140−150
+282%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1044%
103
+1044%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−10700%
100−110
+10700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1514%
110−120
+1514%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1750%
111
+1750%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1767%
110−120
+1767%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1325%
220−230
+1325%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1438%
120−130
+1438%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−957%
243
+957%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−2183%
274
+2183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−950%
147
+950%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−177%
108
+177%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1571%
110−120
+1571%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−2620%
130−140
+2620%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1820%
95−100
+1820%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3000%
93
+3000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3500%
70−75
+3500%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7200%
73
+7200%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2267%
70−75
+2267%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1000%
85−90
+1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2200%
184
+2200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−5150%
100−110
+5150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−1194%
230−240
+1194%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1633%
100−110
+1633%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−7000%
70−75
+7000%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2850%
55−60
+2850%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−2800%
58
+2800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−4500%
45−50
+4500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−4300%
40−45
+4300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−9600%
95−100
+9600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−4500%
46
+4500%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1450%
60−65
+1450%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 135
+0%
135
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 205
+0%
205
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109
+0%
109
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 36
+0%
36
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 119
+0%
119
+0%

This is how Quadro K620M and RTX 3070 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Ti is 776% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Ti is 2350% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 Ti is 2100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3070 Ti is 10700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Ti is ahead in 62 tests (86%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.02 61.10
Recency 1 March 2015 31 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 290 Watt

Quadro K620M has 866.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070 Ti, on the other hand, has a 1923.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K620M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K620M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K620M
Quadro K620M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate Quadro K620M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 5934 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.