Quadro RTX 6000 vs Quadro K4100M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K4100M with Quadro RTX 6000, including specs and performance data.

K4100M
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
7.16

RTX 6000 outperforms K4100M by a whopping 578% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking54465
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.505.27
Power efficiency4.9913.02
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK104TU102
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 $6,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 6000 has 954% better value for money than K4100M.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores11524608
Core clock speed706 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate67.78509.8
Floating-point processing power1.627 TFLOPS16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs96288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K4100M 7.16
RTX 6000 48.56
+578%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K4100M 2762
RTX 6000 18733
+578%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

K4100M 8777
RTX 6000 148952
+1597%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

K4100M 7058
RTX 6000 126987
+1699%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

K4100M 6821
RTX 6000 159550
+2239%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47
−538%
300−350
+538%
4K13
−554%
85−90
+554%

Cost per frame, $

1080p31.8921.00
4K115.3174.11

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−536%
70−75
+536%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−567%
120−130
+567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−567%
140−150
+567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−536%
70−75
+536%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−550%
130−140
+550%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−538%
300−310
+538%
Hitman 3 14−16
−543%
90−95
+543%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−567%
280−290
+567%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−550%
130−140
+550%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−550%
130−140
+550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−567%
160−170
+567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−548%
350−400
+548%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−567%
120−130
+567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−567%
140−150
+567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−536%
70−75
+536%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−550%
130−140
+550%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−538%
300−310
+538%
Hitman 3 14−16
−543%
90−95
+543%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−567%
280−290
+567%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−550%
130−140
+550%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−550%
130−140
+550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−567%
160−170
+567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 67
−572%
450−500
+572%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−548%
350−400
+548%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−567%
120−130
+567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−536%
70−75
+536%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−538%
300−310
+538%
Hitman 3 14−16
−543%
90−95
+543%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−567%
280−290
+567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−567%
160−170
+567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−536%
140−150
+536%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−548%
350−400
+548%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−550%
130−140
+550%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−543%
90−95
+543%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−536%
70−75
+536%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−540%
160−170
+540%
Hitman 3 10−12
−536%
70−75
+536%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−567%
300−310
+567%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−567%
80−85
+567%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Hitman 3 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−552%
150−160
+552%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%

This is how K4100M and RTX 6000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 is 538% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 is 554% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.16 48.56
Recency 23 July 2013 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 260 Watt

K4100M has 160% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000, on the other hand, has a 578.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K4100M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K4100M is a mobile workstation card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Quadro K4100M
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 77 votes

Rate Quadro K4100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 130 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.