Radeon RX 6600 XT vs HD Graphics P630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics P630 and Radeon RX 6600 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics P630
2016
1740 MB DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
3.11

RX 6600 XT outperforms HD Graphics P630 by a whopping 1278% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking75891
Place by popularitynot in top-10093
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data63.01
Power efficiency14.2118.37
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 August 2016 (8 years ago)30 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922048
Core clock speed350 MHz1968 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz2589 MHz
Number of transistors189 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate26.40331.4
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPS10.6 TFLOPS
ROPs364
TMUs24128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1740 MB8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.1.1031.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics P630 3.11
RX 6600 XT 42.87
+1278%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics P630 1198
RX 6600 XT 16519
+1279%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9−10
−1400%
135
+1400%
1440p5−6
−1400%
75
+1400%
4K3−4
−1367%
44
+1367%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.81
1440pno data5.05
4Kno data8.61

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1217%
79
+1217%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−900%
90−95
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−12800%
129
+12800%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−2183%
130−140
+2183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1129%
85−90
+1129%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1200%
78
+1200%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1417%
90−95
+1417%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1213%
100−110
+1213%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1071%
190−200
+1071%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1250%
108
+1250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−657%
170−180
+657%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−3225%
130−140
+3225%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1113%
95−100
+1113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1123%
150−160
+1123%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−241%
130−140
+241%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−900%
90−95
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−10500%
106
+10500%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−2183%
130−140
+2183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1129%
85−90
+1129%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1167%
76
+1167%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1417%
90−95
+1417%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1213%
100−110
+1213%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1071%
190−200
+1071%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1250%
108
+1250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−657%
170−180
+657%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−3225%
130−140
+3225%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1113%
95−100
+1113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1508%
209
+1508%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−529%
85−90
+529%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−241%
130−140
+241%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−900%
90−95
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−7400%
75
+7400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1129%
85−90
+1129%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1050%
69
+1050%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1417%
90−95
+1417%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1071%
190−200
+1071%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1150%
100
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−583%
157
+583%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1308%
183
+1308%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−607%
99
+607%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−56.4%
61
+56.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1113%
95−100
+1113%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1560%
80−85
+1560%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1467%
45−50
+1467%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40
+1900%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1533%
45−50
+1533%
Hitman 3 8−9
−738%
67
+738%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1350%
116
+1350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−3100%
60−65
+3100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−963%
200−210
+963%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1133%
70−75
+1133%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−4200%
40−45
+4200%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1750%
35−40
+1750%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2700%
28
+2700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−2700%
27−30
+2700%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−2300%
24
+2300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−875%
35−40
+875%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Metro Exodus 98
+0%
98
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 118
+0%
118
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 33
+0%
33
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+0%
54
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 61
+0%
61
+0%

This is how HD Graphics P630 and RX 6600 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 XT is 1400% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600 XT is 1400% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600 XT is 1367% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6600 XT is 12800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6600 XT is ahead in 62 tests (86%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.11 42.87
Recency 5 August 2016 30 July 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1740 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 160 Watt

HD Graphics P630 has 966.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6600 XT, on the other hand, has a 1278.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 370.8% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P630 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics P630
HD Graphics P630
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 19 votes

Rate HD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4340 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.