GeForce GTX 860M OEM vs Quadro K2200M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking453not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.08no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameGM107GM107
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date19 July 2014 (9 years ago)5 February 2015 (9 years ago)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640640
Core clock speed667 MHz1020 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1085 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate26.6843.40
Floating-point performance853.8 gflops1,389 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro K2200M and GeForce GTX 860M OEM compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/s80.19 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA5.05.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 July 2014 5 February 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 75 Watt

K2200M has 15.4% lower power consumption.

GTX 860M OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K2200M and GeForce GTX 860M OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K2200M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 860M OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
Quadro K2200M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M OEM
GeForce GTX 860M OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 39 votes

Rate Quadro K2200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 37 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 860M OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.