Radeon R5 M250 vs Quadro

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking832not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameNV10Jet
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1999 (25 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data320
Core clock speed135 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speedno data700 MHz
Number of transistors17 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology220 nm28 nm
Texture fill rate0.5414.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.448 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs420

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1800 MBps
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5 (5.1)
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A2.1 (1.2)
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 220 nm 28 nm

R5 M250 has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro and Radeon R5 M250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R5 M250 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro
Quadro
AMD Radeon R5 M250
Radeon R5 M250

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 5 votes

Rate Quadro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 2 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.