HD Graphics 2500 vs Quadro K2200

Place in the ranking	483	1187
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.63	no data
Power efficiency	9.37	no data
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	Generation 7.0 (2012−2013)
GPU code name	GM107	Ivy Bridge GT1
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	22 July 2014 (10 years ago)	1 April 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$395.75	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	48
Core clock speed	1046 MHz	650 MHz
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz	1150 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	392 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	unknown
Texture fill rate	44.96	6.900
Floating-point processing power	1.439 TFLOPS	0.1104 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	1
TMUs	40	6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	202 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

No outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.0
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.1.80
CUDA	5.0	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

100−110
+1150%

−1150%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

3.96

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Valorant	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	12 +0%	12 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Valorant	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Valorant	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	0−1	0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart	0−1	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

This is how Quadro K2200 and HD Graphics 2500 compete in popular games:

Quadro K2200 is 1150% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 35 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.29	0.69
Recency	22 July 2014	1 April 2012
Chip lithography	28 nm	22 nm

Quadro K2200 has a 1246.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

HD Graphics 2500, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro K2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K2200 is a workstation graphics card while HD Graphics 2500 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Quadro K2200

HD Graphics 2500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile

Pro W6600M

P4200

RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB

RX 6650M XT

Arc A550M

GT 220 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 430 votes

Rate Quadro K2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

3.2 1463 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K2200 or HD Graphics 2500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.