Quadro T500 Mobile vs Quadro K1000M

Place in the ranking	888	483
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.48	no data
Power efficiency	3.09	34.39
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GK107	TU117
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 June 2012 (12 years ago)	2 December 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$119.90	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	896
Core clock speed	850 MHz	1365 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1695 MHz
Number of transistors	1,270 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	18 Watt
Texture fill rate	13.60	94.92
Floating-point processing power	0.3264 TFLOPS	3.037 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	16	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.2
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K1000M 2.02

T500 Mobile 9.00
+346%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

K1000M 1102

T500 Mobile 7996
+626%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	9 −344%	40−45 +344%
Full HD	16 −125%	36 +125%
1440p	3−4 −400%	15 +400%
4K	3−4 −467%	17 +467%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	7.49	no data
1440p	39.97	no data
4K	39.97	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−250%

14−16
+250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −214%	21−24 +214%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −2600%	27−30 +2600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −900%	30 +900%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −400%	24−27 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −650%	60−65 +650%
Hitman 3	7−8 −143%	16−18 +143%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −178%	50−55 +178%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −525%	24−27 +525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −200%	30−33 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −71.4%	60−65 +71.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −214%	21−24 +214%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −2600%	27−30 +2600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −833%	28 +833%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −400%	24−27 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −650%	60−65 +650%
Hitman 3	7−8 −143%	16−18 +143%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −178%	50−55 +178%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −525%	24−27 +525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −200%	30−33 +200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −133%	28 +133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −71.4%	60−65 +71.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −214%	21−24 +214%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −800%	27 +800%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −650%	60−65 +650%
Hitman 3	7−8 −329%	30−33 +329%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −344%	80−85 +344%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −300%	40−45 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −58.3%	19 +58.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −71.4%	60−65 +71.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
−300%

16−18

+300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Hitman 3	7−8 −329%	30−33 +329%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −300%	24−27 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 −418%	55−60 +418%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6
−320%

21−24

+320%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−300%

4−5
+300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	3−4

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4
−300%

12−14

+300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

12−14

+0%

12−14

+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Hitman 3	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Battlefield 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Hitman 3	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%

This is how K1000M and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

T500 Mobile is 344% faster in 900p
T500 Mobile is 125% faster in 1080p
T500 Mobile is 400% faster in 1440p
T500 Mobile is 467% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T500 Mobile is 2600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

T500 Mobile is ahead in 39 tests (58%)
there's a draw in 28 tests (42%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.02	9.00
Recency	1 June 2012	2 December 2020
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	18 Watt

T500 Mobile has a 345.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K1000M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.