Quadro K1000M: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

Quadro K1000M provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 1.73% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 5090 D.

Summary

NVIDIA started Quadro K1000M sales 1 June 2012 at a recommended price of $119.90 . This is a Kepler architecture notebook card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 2 GB of DDR3 memory clocked at 0.9 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 28.8 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is a graphics card attached via MXM-A (3.0) interface. Power consumption is at 45 Watt.

Primary details

Some basic facts about Quadro K1000M: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in the ranking906
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.50
Power efficiency3.05of 100.00 (Radeon 890M)
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK107
Market segmentMobile workstation
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119.90 of 14,999 (Quadro Plex 7000)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Quadro K1000M's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro K1000M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192of 24064 (RTX PRO 6000)
Core clock speed850 MHzof 2670 MHz (Arc B580)
Number of transistors1,270 millionof 153,000 million (Radeon Instinct MI300)
Manufacturing process technology28 nmof 3 nm (Arc Graphics 140V)
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattof 2400 Watt (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate13.60of 2,554 (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPSof 115.8 (RTX PRO 6000)
ROPs16of 512 (Moore Threads MTT S4000)
TMUs16of 1280 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)

Form factor & compatibility

This section provides details about the physical dimensions of Quadro K1000M and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro K1000M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory typeDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GBof 288 GB (Radeon Instinct MI325X)
Memory bus width128 Bitof 8192 Bit (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed900 MHzof 20000 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile)
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sof 5,171 GB/s (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Shared memory-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro K1000M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro K1000M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+

API and SDK compatibility

APIs supported by Quadro K1000M, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.1
OpenGL4.6
OpenCL1.2
Vulkan+
CUDA+

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of Quadro K1000M. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

K1000M 1.73

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K1000M 773

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

K1000M 1102

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

K1000M 5165

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

K1000M 1745

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

K1000M 1509

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

K1000M 1335

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

K1000M 5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Quadro K1000M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

900p9
Full HD18

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.66

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
Battlefield 5 5−6
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
Far Cry 5 2−3
Fortnite 8−9
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
Valorant 35−40

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
Battlefield 5 5−6
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
Dota 2 21−24
Far Cry 5 2−3
Fortnite 8−9
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
Metro Exodus 3−4
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
Valorant 35−40

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
Dota 2 21−24
Far Cry 5 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
Valorant 35−40

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
Valorant 12−14

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
Far Cry 5 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
Valorant 10−11

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1
Dota 2 4−5
Far Cry 5 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4

Closest competitors

Quadro K1000M's performance relative to its closest rivals among mobile workstation graphics cards.


Quadro 3000M 128.9
FirePro M4150 128.32
FirePro M7740 106.94
Quadro K1000M 100
Quadro 2000M 98.84
Quadro K610M 91.33
Quadro K510M 82.66

AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Quadro K1000M is FirePro M7740, which is faster by 7% and higher by 21 positions in our ranking.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro K1000M:

FirePro M4150 128.32
FirePro M7740 106.94
Quadro K1000M 100

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with Quadro K1000M according to our statistics.

All comparisons with Quadro K1000M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


3.6 88 votes

Rate Quadro K1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K1000M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.