RTX A5000 Mobile vs Quadro GV100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro GV100 Tesla PG500-216 Tesla V100 FHHL Tesla V100 PCIe Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB Tesla V100 SMX2 Tesla V100 SXM2 Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
VS
RTX A1000 Embedded RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB RTX A4000 Mobile RTX A4500 Mobile RTX A5000 Max-Q RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5500 Max-Q RTX A5500 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro GV100 with RTX A5000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro GV100
2018
32 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
51.39
+23%

GV100 outperforms RTX A5000 Mobile by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5000 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5196
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.61no data
Power efficiency14.2319.28
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGV100GA104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date27 March 2018 (6 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51206144
Core clock speed1132 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1627 MHz1575 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate520.6302.4
Floating-point processing power16.66 TFLOPS19.35 TFLOPS
ROPs12896
TMUs320192
Tensor Cores640192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB16 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth868.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.08.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro GV100 51.39
+23%
RTX A5000 Mobile 41.77

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro GV100 19824
+23%
RTX A5000 Mobile 16114

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+16.1%
112
−16.1%
1440p85−90
+21.4%
70
−21.4%
4K60−65
+17.6%
51
−17.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p69.22no data
1440p105.87no data
4K149.98no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76
+0%
76
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Hitman 3 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 64
+0%
64
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Hitman 3 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 192
+0%
192
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55
+0%
55
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Hitman 3 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 133
+0%
133
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 160
+0%
160
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
+0%
90
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45
+0%
45
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 44
+0%
44
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Hitman 3 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 62
+0%
62
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 129
+0%
129
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hitman 3 38
+0%
38
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
+0%
58
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 29
+0%
29
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75
+0%
75
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 26
+0%
26
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how Quadro GV100 and RTX A5000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro GV100 is 16% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro GV100 is 21% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro GV100 is 18% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 51.39 41.77
Recency 27 March 2018 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 150 Watt

Quadro GV100 has a 23% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX A5000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro GV100 is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A5000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro GV100 is a workstation card while RTX A5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Quadro GV100
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
RTX A5000 Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
Pro W6800 Radeon Pro W6800
RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5000 Mobile
vs
RTX A4000 Mobile RTX A4000 Mobile
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
RTX A4000 RTX A4000
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
Pro W6900X Radeon Pro W6900X
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
A10G A10G
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
A30 PCIe A30 PCIe
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
A10 PCIe A10 PCIe
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
T1000 T1000
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
T600 T600
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
A100 PCIe 80 GB A100 PCIe 80 GB
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
RTX A2000 RTX A2000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 52 votes

Rate Quadro GV100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 53 votes

Rate RTX A5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.