Quadro RTX 8200 vs Quadro GP100

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking92not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.59no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP100GA102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35847552
Core clock speed1304 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1442 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors15,300 million40,000 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)235 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate323.0708.0
Floating-point processing power10.34 TFLOPS22.66 TFLOPS
ROPs9696
TMUs224472

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB48 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed715 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth732.2 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.0-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 235 Watt 260 Watt

Quadro GP100 has 10.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 8200, on the other hand, has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro GP100 and Quadro RTX 8200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Quadro GP100
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8200
Quadro RTX 8200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 14 votes

Rate Quadro GP100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 15 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.