Radeon RX 7600M XT vs Quadro FX 4700 X2

Quadro FX 4000 Quadro FX 4000 SDI Quadro FX 4400 Quadro FX 4400G Quadro FX 4500 Quadro FX 4500 SDI Quadro FX 4500 X2 Quadro FX 4600 Quadro FX 4600 SDI Quadro FX 4700 X2 Quadro FX 4800 Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
VS
Radeon RX 7600M Radeon RX 7600M XT Radeon RX 7600S Radeon RX 7700S Radeon RX 7800M Radeon RX 7900M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 4700 X2 with Radeon RX 7600M XT, including specs and performance data.

FX 4700 X2
2008
1 GB GDDR3, 226 Watt
1.74

RX 7600M XT outperforms FX 4700 X2 by a whopping 1829% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

FX 4700 X2 FX 4700 X2
RX 7600M XT RX 7600M XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking935161
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.5419.50
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameG92Navi 33
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 April 2008 (16 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128 ×22048
Core clock speed600 MHz1280 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2469 MHz
Number of transistors754 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)226 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate38.40 ×2316.0
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS ×220.23 TFLOPS
ROPs16 ×264
TMUs64 ×2128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB ×28 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s ×2288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 4700 X2 1.74
RX 7600M XT 33.56
+1829%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 4700 X2 676
RX 7600M XT 13071
+1834%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6−7
−1833%
116
+1833%
1440p2−3
−2600%
54
+2600%
4K1−2
−3100%
32
+3100%

Cost per frame, $

1080p499.83no data
1440p1499.50no data
4K2999.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 186
+0%
186
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 105
+0%
105
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 116
+0%
116
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 140
+0%
140
+0%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 96
+0%
96
+0%
Far Cry 5 127
+0%
127
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 245
+0%
245
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 85
+0%
85
+0%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 82
+0%
82
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
+0%
81
+0%
Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 127
+0%
127
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 237
+0%
237
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 133
+0%
133
+0%
Metro Exodus 98
+0%
98
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 186
+0%
186
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60
+0%
60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+0%
74
+0%
Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 120
+0%
120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180
+0%
180
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 105
+0%
105
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70
+0%
70
+0%
Metro Exodus 58
+0%
58
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+0%
48
+0%
Far Cry 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 142
+0%
142
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+0%
76
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 1
+0%
1
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 74
+0%
74
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
+0%
53
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Dota 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how FX 4700 X2 and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600M XT is 1833% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600M XT is 2600% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600M XT is 3100% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.74 33.56
Recency 18 April 2008 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 226 Watt 120 Watt

RX 7600M XT has a 1828.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 983.3% more advanced lithography process, and 88.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7600M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 4700 X2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4700 X2 is a workstation card while Radeon RX 7600M XT is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
Quadro FX 4700 X2
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FX 4700 X2 Quadro FX 4700 X2
vs
NVS 510 NVS 510
RX 7600M XT Radeon RX 7600M XT
vs
RX 7800M Radeon RX 7800M
FX 4700 X2 Quadro FX 4700 X2
vs
FireStream 9170 FireStream 9170
FX 1700 Mac Edition Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
vs
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
Plex 1000 Model II Quadro Plex 1000 Model II
vs
Plex 2200 D2 Quadro Plex 2200 D2
Plex 1000 Model II Quadro Plex 1000 Model II
vs
Radeon 625 Radeon 625
Plex 2200 S4 Quadro Plex 2200 S4
vs
RTX 3080 GeForce RTX 3080
Tesla S1075 Tesla S1075
vs
RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 5700 XT
FX 3700 Quadro FX 3700
vs
ATI HD 4750 Radeon HD 4750
FX 3700 Quadro FX 3700
vs
Graphics Radeon Graphics
FX 3700 Quadro FX 3700
vs
RX 6300M Radeon RX 6300M
Tesla S870 Tesla S870
vs
RX 6600 XT Radeon RX 6600 XT
FX 5600 Quadro FX 5600
vs
ATI 9200 PCI Radeon 9200 PCI

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4700 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 75 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 4700 X2 or Radeon RX 7600M XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.