Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro FX 3700

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1106not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.87no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameG92GT200B
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date8 January 2008 (16 years ago)11 November 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 $1,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores112192
Core clock speed500 MHz602 MHz
Number of transistors754 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)78 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate28.0038.53
Floating-point processing power0.28 TFLOPS0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs5664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1536 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.11.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2008 11 November 2008
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 78 Watt 150 Watt

FX 3700 has 92.3% lower power consumption.

FX 4800 Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3700 and Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
Quadro FX 3700
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 21 vote

Rate Quadro FX 3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.