RTX A5000 Mobile vs Quadro FX 3600M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 3600M with RTX A5000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

FX 3600M
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 70 Watt
1.21

RTX A5000 Mobile outperforms FX 3600M by a whopping 3328% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking105795
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG92GA104
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date23 February 2008 (16 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores646144
Core clock speed500 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1575 MHz
Number of transistors754 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate16.00302.4
Floating-point processing power0.16 TFLOPS19.35 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs32192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-HEPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed799 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.14 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.18.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 3600M 1.21
RTX A5000 Mobile 41.48
+3328%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 3600M 466
RTX A5000 Mobile 15997
+3333%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−3467%
107
+3467%
1440p1−2
−6400%
65
+6400%
4K1−2
−4700%
48
+4700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1300%
80−85
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8500%
85−90
+8500%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−3167%
95−100
+3167%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−9550%
190−200
+9550%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1079%
160−170
+1079%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4500%
90−95
+4500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1725%
140−150
+1725%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−303%
120−130
+303%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1300%
80−85
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8500%
85−90
+8500%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−3167%
95−100
+3167%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−9550%
190−200
+9550%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1079%
160−170
+1079%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4500%
90−95
+4500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2300%
192
+2300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−645%
80−85
+645%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−303%
120−130
+303%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1300%
80−85
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8500%
85−90
+8500%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−9550%
190−200
+9550%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−850%
133
+850%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1900%
160
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−718%
90
+718%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−40.6%
45
+40.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4500%
90−95
+4500%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−7600%
75−80
+7600%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2950%
60−65
+2950%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−4200%
40−45
+4200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 45−50
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3100%
30−35
+3100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4500%
45−50
+4500%
Hitman 3 7−8
−643%
50−55
+643%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−2075%
85−90
+2075%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 55−60
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−3760%
190−200
+3760%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1600%
65−70
+1600%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 30−35

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2800%
29
+2800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 24−27
Far Cry 5 0−1 21−24

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76
+0%
76
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 64
+0%
64
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55
+0%
55
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 44
+0%
44
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 62
+0%
62
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 129
+0%
129
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hitman 3 38
+0%
38
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
+0%
58
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75
+0%
75
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 26
+0%
26
+0%

This is how FX 3600M and RTX A5000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A5000 Mobile is 3467% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A5000 Mobile is 6400% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A5000 Mobile is 4700% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX A5000 Mobile is 9550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A5000 Mobile is ahead in 47 tests (70%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.21 41.48
Recency 23 February 2008 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 150 Watt

FX 3600M has 114.3% lower power consumption.

RTX A5000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 3328.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A5000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 3600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3600M is a mobile workstation card while RTX A5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
Quadro FX 3600M
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
RTX A5000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 53 votes

Rate RTX A5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.