Tesla P40 vs Quadro FX 350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated166
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.93
Architectureno dataPascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameG72MGP102
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date31 March 2006 (18 years ago)13 September 2016 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores73840
Core clock speed3 MHz1303 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHz1531 MHz
Number of transistors112 million11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate1.800367.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR-3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data7.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s347.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 350M 44
Tesla P40 12498
+28305%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 March 2006 13 September 2016
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

FX 350M has 1566.7% lower power consumption.

Tesla P40, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 38300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 462.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 350M and Tesla P40. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 350M is a mobile workstation card while Tesla P40 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
Quadro FX 350M
NVIDIA Tesla P40
Tesla P40

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 181 vote

Rate Tesla P40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.