Radeon RX 6800 XT vs GeForce Go 7200

Place in the ranking	1441	28
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	50.58
Power efficiency	no data	14.84
Architecture	Curie (2003−2013)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	G72	Navi 21
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 September 2006 (18 years ago)	28 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	7	4608
Core clock speed	450 MHz	1825 MHz
Boost clock speed	450 MHz	2250 MHz
Number of transistors	112 million	26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	1.800	648.0
Floating-point processing power	no data	20.74 TFLOPS
ROPs	1	128
TMUs	4	288
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	16 GB
Memory bus width	32 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	350 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	2.8 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	3.0	6.5
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Go 7200 0.12

RX 6800 XT 64.95
+54025%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7200 45

RX 6800 XT 25027
+55516%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	-0−1	207
1440p	-0−1	143
4K	-0−1	93

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.14
1440p	no data	4.54
4K	no data	6.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−6150%

120−130
+6150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −4367%	130−140 +4367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −5700%	110−120 +5700%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −6150%	120−130 +6150%
Hitman 3	4−5 −3200%	132 +3200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −2900%	240−250 +2900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −6600%	260−270 +6600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −1004%	309 +1004%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −4367%	130−140 +4367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −5700%	110−120 +5700%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −6150%	120−130 +6150%
Hitman 3	4−5 −3300%	136 +3300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −2900%	240−250 +2900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −8775%	355 +8775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −1422%	130−140 +1422%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −1004%	309 +1004%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −4367%	130−140 +4367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −5700%	110−120 +5700%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −6150%	120−130 +6150%
Hitman 3	4−5 −2950%	122 +2950%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −3388%	279 +3388%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −7450%	302 +7450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −1678%	160 +1678%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −300%	112 +300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	65−70
Hitman 3	6−7 −1800%	114 +1800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −10650%	215 +10650%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−5700%

116
+5700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −5100%	50−55 +5100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	65

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−3700%

76
+3700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	158 +0%	158 +0%
Battlefield 5	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 +0%	230−240 +0%
Metro Exodus	144 +0%	144 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	122 +0%	122 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	135 +0%	135 +0%
Battlefield 5	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 +0%	230−240 +0%
Metro Exodus	144 +0%	144 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	118 +0%	118 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 +0%	230−240 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120

+0%

120

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	98 +0%	98 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%
Metro Exodus	112 +0%	112 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	222 +0%	222 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	314 +0%	314 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Hitman 3	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Metro Exodus	126 +0%	126 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110 +0%	110 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	133 +0%	133 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	49 +0%	49 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6800 XT is 10650% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6800 XT is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.12	64.95
Recency	1 September 2006	28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	16 GB
Chip lithography	90 nm	7 nm

RX 6800 XT has a 54025% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7200 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6800 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.