GeForce RTX 4090 vs Quadro FX 3500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX 3500M
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 45 Watt
0.79

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms Quadro FX 3500M by a whopping 12558% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking11101
Place by popularitynot in top-1004
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.1115.28
ArchitectureG7x (2005−2007)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameG71GLMAD102-300-A1
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2007 (17 years ago)20 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99.99 $1,599
Current price$69 (0.7x MSRP)$1756 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4090 has 13791% better value for money than FX 3500M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3216384
Core clock speed8 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed575 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors278 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate13.801,290

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro FX 3500M and GeForce RTX 4090 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount512 MB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s1,008 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDAno data8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 3500M 0.79
RTX 4090 100.00
+12558%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms Quadro FX 3500M by 12558% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FX 3500M 306
RTX 4090 38643
+12528%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms Quadro FX 3500M by 12528% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−13300%
268
+13300%
1440p1−2
−20700%
208
+20700%
4K1−2
−15100%
152
+15100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7400%
225
+7400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−8250%
160−170
+8250%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7300%
222
+7300%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−2680%
130−140
+2680%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−10700%
300−350
+10700%
Hitman 3 3−4
−4900%
150−160
+4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−3517%
434
+3517%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 120−130
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−5933%
543
+5933%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−8250%
160−170
+8250%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7033%
214
+7033%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−2860%
148
+2860%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−10700%
300−350
+10700%
Hitman 3 3−4
−4900%
150−160
+4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−3542%
437
+3542%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 120−130
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−4544%
418
+4544%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−19000%
573
+19000%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−8250%
160−170
+8250%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−6900%
210
+6900%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−2680%
130−140
+2680%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−10700%
300−350
+10700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−3183%
394
+3183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−10067%
305
+10067%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 120−130

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 160−170
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 140−150

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2700%
110−120
+2700%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−15300%
154
+15300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−18500%
186
+18500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−9600%
388
+9600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−26700%
268
+26700%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 5−6
−2420%
126
+2420%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−20900%
210
+20900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−28400%
285
+28400%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−3525%
145
+3525%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5450%
110−120
+5450%

This is how FX 3500M and RTX 4090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 is 13300% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 is 20700% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 is 15100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4090 is 28400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4090 surpassed FX 3500M in all 32 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 100.00
Recency 1 March 2007 20 September 2022
Cost $99.99 $1599
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 450 Watt

The GeForce RTX 4090 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 3500M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3500M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4090 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
Quadro FX 3500M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 4090

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 3500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 11972 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.