GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Quadro FX 3500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 3500M with GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, including specs and performance data.

FX 3500M
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 45 Watt
0.79

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms FX 3500M by a whopping 10347% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11477
Place by popularitynot in top-10089
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.1148.87
Power efficiency1.2019.85
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG71AD103
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2007 (17 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99.99 $799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 44327% better value for money than FX 3500M.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores328448
Core clock speed575 MHz2340 MHz
Boost clock speed575 MHz2610 MHz
Number of transistors278 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rate13.80689.0
Floating-point processing powerno data44.1 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs24264
Tensor Coresno data264
Ray Tracing Coresno data66

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data310 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s672.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 3500M 0.79
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 82.53
+10347%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 3500M 306
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 31801
+10292%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−11350%
229
+11350%
1440p1−2
−15200%
153
+15200%
4K0−195

Cost per frame, $

1080p50.003.49
1440p99.995.22
4Kno data8.41

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−9900%
300−310
+9900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−3260%
160−170
+3260%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−9900%
300−310
+9900%
Far Cry 5 0−1 110−120
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−20000%
200−210
+20000%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2480%
120−130
+2480%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−2325%
290−300
+2325%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 120−130
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−5043%
350−400
+5043%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−397%
150−160
+397%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−3260%
160−170
+3260%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−9900%
300−310
+9900%
Far Cry 5 0−1 110−120
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−20000%
200−210
+20000%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2480%
120−130
+2480%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−2325%
290−300
+2325%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 120−130
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−6214%
442
+6214%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1730%
180−190
+1730%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−397%
150−160
+397%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−3260%
160−170
+3260%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−9900%
300−310
+9900%
Far Cry 5 0−1 110−120
Hitman 3 5−6
−2480%
120−130
+2480%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−2325%
290−300
+2325%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−5714%
407
+5714%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−2000%
210
+2000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−365%
144
+365%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 120−130

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 160−170
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−11100%
110−120
+11100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 95−100
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8300%
80−85
+8300%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−5450%
220−230
+5450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 159
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−7900%
240−250
+7900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−4100%
120−130
+4100%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 65−70

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−7100%
70−75
+7100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 65−70
Far Cry 5 0−1 50−55

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4850%
95−100
+4850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 306
+0%
306
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Hitman 3 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 162
+0%
162
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 69
+0%
69
+0%

This is how FX 3500M and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 11350% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 15200% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 20000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is ahead in 30 tests (56%)
  • there's a draw in 24 tests (44%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 82.53
Recency 1 March 2007 8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 285 Watt

FX 3500M has 533.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, on the other hand, has a 10346.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 3500M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3500M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
Quadro FX 3500M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 3500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2664 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.