GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs GT 330M

Place in the ranking	1207	9
Place by popularity	not in top-100	12
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	67.23
Power efficiency	1.69	24.62
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GT216	AD104
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	10 January 2010 (14 years ago)	8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	7168
Core clock speed	625 MHz	1980 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2475 MHz
Number of transistors	486 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	220 Watt
Texture fill rate	10.00	554.4
Floating-point processing power	0.06528 TFLOPS	35.48 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	182	no data
ROPs	8	80
TMUs	16	224
Tensor Cores	no data	224
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	Up to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.28 GB/s	504.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	HDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGADisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management

8.0

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.7
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	+	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 330M 0.56

RTX 4070 SUPER 78.16
+13857%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 330M 216

RTX 4070 SUPER 30159
+13863%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	10 −13400%	1350−1400 +13400%
Full HD	17 −1212%	223 +1212%
1440p	1−2 −14500%	146 +14500%
4K	0−1	84

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.69
1440p	no data	4.10
4K	no data	7.13

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−13233%

400−450
+13233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −3875%	150−160 +3875%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −3900%	120−130 +3900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −13233%	400−450 +13233%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −19300%	190−200 +19300%
Hitman 3	5−6 −2480%	120−130 +2480%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −2427%	270−280 +2427%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −5517%	300−350 +5517%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −413%	150−160 +413%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −3875%	150−160 +3875%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −3900%	120−130 +3900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −13233%	400−450 +13233%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −19300%	190−200 +19300%
Hitman 3	5−6 −2480%	120−130 +2480%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −2427%	270−280 +2427%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −7033%	428 +7033%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −1610%	170−180 +1610%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −413%	150−160 +413%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −3875%	150−160 +3875%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −3900%	120−130 +3900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −13233%	400−450 +13233%
Hitman 3	5−6 −2480%	120−130 +2480%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −2427%	270−280 +2427%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −6250%	381 +6250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −1910%	201 +1910%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −363%	139 +363%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−11100%

110−120
+11100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	90−95
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −12900%	130−140 +12900%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −8300%	80−85 +8300%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1800%	110−120 +1800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −6767%	200−210 +6767%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −23900%	240−250 +23900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−4000%

120−130
+4000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −6600%	65−70 +6600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	60−65

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−4400%

90−95
+4400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Battlefield 5	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Battlefield 5	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

+0%

120−130

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5

160−170

+0%

160−170

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%
Metro Exodus	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	265 +0%	265 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	154 +0%	154 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Hitman 3	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	133 +0%	133 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	132 +0%	132 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	62 +0%	62 +0%

This is how GT 330M and RTX 4070 SUPER compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 SUPER is 13400% faster in 900p
RTX 4070 SUPER is 1212% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 SUPER is 14500% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4070 SUPER is 23900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 4070 SUPER is ahead in 30 tests (47%)
there's a draw in 34 tests (53%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.56	78.16
Recency	10 January 2010	8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	220 Watt

GT 330M has 856.5% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 13857.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 330M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 330M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.