Tesla S2050 vs Quadro FX 1700

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1237not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.77no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG84GF100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date12 September 2007 (17 years ago)25 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $11,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32448
Core clock speed460 MHz574 MHz
Number of transistors289 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)42 Watt900 Watt
Texture fill rate7.36032.14
Floating-point processing power0.05888 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs1656

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB3 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz773 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s148.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.12.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 September 2007 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 42 Watt 900 Watt

FX 1700 has 2042.9% lower power consumption.

Tesla S2050, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1700 and Tesla S2050. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Quadro FX 1700
NVIDIA Tesla S2050
Tesla S2050

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 24 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 57 votes

Rate Tesla S2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.