RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro FX 1600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 1600M and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

FX 1600M
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 50 Watt
0.34
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
12 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
49.74
+14529%

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms FX 1600M by a whopping 14529% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking129562
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.4729.64
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG84no data
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date1 June 2007 (17 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149.90 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores325120
Core clock speed625 MHzno data
Number of transistors289 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate10.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-HEno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 1600M 0.34
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 49.74
+14529%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 1600M 131
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 19163
+14528%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−14400%
290−300
+14400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−13233%
400−450
+13233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−14400%
290−300
+14400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−14400%
290−300
+14400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−13650%
550−600
+13650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−14275%
1150−1200
+14275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−13650%
550−600
+13650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−14364%
4050−4100
+14364%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−13233%
400−450
+13233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−14400%
290−300
+14400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−14400%
290−300
+14400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−13650%
550−600
+13650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−14275%
1150−1200
+14275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−13650%
550−600
+13650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−14344%
1300−1350
+14344%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−14364%
4050−4100
+14364%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−13233%
400−450
+13233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−14400%
290−300
+14400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−14400%
290−300
+14400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−13650%
550−600
+13650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−14275%
1150−1200
+14275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−13650%
550−600
+13650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−14344%
1300−1350
+14344%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−14364%
4050−4100
+14364%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−14067%
850−900
+14067%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−14400%
290−300
+14400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−14400%
290−300
+14400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−13900%
140−150
+13900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−14400%
290−300
+14400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 49.74
Recency 1 June 2007 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 115 Watt

FX 1600M has 130% lower power consumption.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 14529.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 1600M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Quadro FX 1600M
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 7 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.