RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro 4000M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 4000M and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro 4000M
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
3.30

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms 4000M by a whopping 1101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking740111
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.35no data
Power efficiency2.2623.61
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF104no data
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date22 February 2011 (13 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3363072
Core clock speed475 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate26.60no data
Floating-point processing power0.6384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs56no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed625 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 4000M 3.30
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 39.62
+1101%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 4000M 1270
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 15264
+1102%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro 4000M 2092
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 28910
+1282%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro 4000M 10722
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 37844
+253%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD71
−1097%
850−900
+1097%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.32no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−1011%
100−105
+1011%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1058%
220−230
+1058%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−1067%
280−290
+1067%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−1025%
450−500
+1025%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−1011%
100−105
+1011%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1058%
220−230
+1058%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−1067%
280−290
+1067%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1100%
180−190
+1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−1025%
450−500
+1025%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1058%
220−230
+1058%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−1067%
280−290
+1067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1100%
180−190
+1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−1025%
450−500
+1025%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−1100%
240−250
+1100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%

This is how Quadro 4000M and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is 1097% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.30 39.62
Recency 22 February 2011 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 115 Watt

Quadro 4000M has 15% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1100.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 4000M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
Quadro 4000M
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 33 votes

Rate Quadro 4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 19 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.