Quadro 4000M: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

Quadro 4000M provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 3.37% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 4090.

Summary

NVIDIA started Quadro 4000M sales 22 February 2011 at a recommended price of $449 . This is a Fermi architecture notebook card based on 40 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 2 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 0.63 GHz are supplied, and together with 256 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 80 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is a graphics card attached via MXM-B (3.0) interface. Power consumption is at 100 Watt.

Primary details

Some basic facts about Quadro 4000M: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in the ranking731
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.31
Power efficiency2.35of 100.00 (Radeon 890M)
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF104
Market segmentMobile workstation
Release date22 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 of 14,999 (Quadro Plex 7000)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

Quadro 4000M's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro 4000M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336of 21760 (GeForce RTX 5090)
Core clock speed475 MHzof 2610 MHz (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Number of transistors1,950 millionof 208,000 million (B200 SXM 192 GB)
Manufacturing process technology40 nmof 3 nm (Arc Graphics 140V)
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattof 2400 Watt (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate26.60of 2,554 (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Floating-point processing power0.6384 TFLOPSof 109.7 (GeForce RTX 5090)
ROPs32of 192 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX)
TMUs56of 1280 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)

Form factor & compatibility

This section provides details about the physical dimensions of Quadro 4000M and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro 4000M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory typeGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GBof 294912 (Radeon Instinct MI325X)
Memory bus width256 Bitof 8192 Bit (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed625 MHzof 20000 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile)
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sof 5,171 GB/s (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Shared memory-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro 4000M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs

API compatibility

APIs supported by Quadro 4000M, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.1
OpenGL4.6
OpenCL1.1
VulkanN/A
CUDA2.1

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of Quadro 4000M. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 4000M 3.37

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 4000M 1302

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro 4000M 2092

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro 4000M 10722

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro 4000M 5212

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Quadro 4000M 18

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Quadro 4000M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD71

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.32

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
Battlefield 5 7−8
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
Far Cry 5 7−8
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
Hitman 3 8−9
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
Metro Exodus 5−6
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
Battlefield 5 7−8
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
Far Cry 5 7−8
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
Hitman 3 8−9
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
Metro Exodus 5−6
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
Far Cry 5 7−8
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
Hitman 3 8−9
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
Far Cry 5 4−5
Forza Horizon 4 0−1
Hitman 3 8−9
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5

Closest competitors

Quadro 4000M's performance relative to its closest rivals among mobile workstation graphics cards.


Quadro K2100M 104.45
FirePro M5950 101.19
Quadro 4000M 100
Quadro K620M 89.61
Quadro M500M 89.32

AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Quadro 4000M is FirePro M5950, which is faster by 1% and higher by 4 positions in our ranking.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro 4000M:

FirePro M4000 122.55
FirePro M5950 101.19
Quadro 4000M 100

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with Quadro 4000M according to our statistics.

All comparisons with Quadro 4000M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


3 33 votes

Rate Quadro 4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Quadro 4000M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.