Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs P106-100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking324not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP106TU102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date19 June 2017 (7 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,299

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12804608
Core clock speed1506 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1709 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate136.7449.3
Floating-point performance4.375 gflops14.38 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length250 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB24 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed8008 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.17.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 June 2017 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 260 Watt

P106-100 has 116.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Passive, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between P106-100 and Quadro RTX 6000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that P106-100 is a desktop card while Quadro RTX 6000 Passive is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA P106-100
P106-100
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 136 votes

Rate P106-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 9 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.