Radeon RX Vega M vs P106-100

Place in the ranking	321	317
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	9.74	79.32
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code name	GP106	Vega
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	19 June 2017 (7 years ago)	1 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	512
Core clock speed	1506 MHz	720 MHz
Boost clock speed	1709 MHz	1190 MHz
Number of transistors	4,400 million	4,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	136.7	38.08
Floating-point processing power	4.375 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	48	8
TMUs	80	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	IGP
Length	250 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	192 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	2002 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	192.2 GB/s	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12.0
Shader Model	6.4	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P106-100 16.76

RX Vega M 17.07
+1.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P106-100 6466

RX Vega M 6586
+1.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	16.76	17.07
Recency	19 June 2017	1 February 2018
Chip lithography	16 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	15 Watt

RX Vega M has a 1.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 700% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between P106-100 and Radeon RX Vega M.

Be aware that P106-100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.