ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 vs NVS 5400M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 5400M and Mobility FireGL V5700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

NVS 5400M
2012
2 GB GDDR3, 35 Watt
1.62
+376%

NVS 5400M outperforms ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 by a whopping 376% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9591300
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.19no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGF108M86
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)7 January 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96120
Core clock speed660 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors585 million378 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate10.564.800
Floating-point processing power0.2534 TFLOPS0.144 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs168

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfaceMXMPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s22.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 5400M 1.62
+376%
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 0.34

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

NVS 5400M 5198
+411%
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 1017

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
+600%
2−3
−600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Elden Ring 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Dota 2 2−3 0−1
Elden Ring 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Fortnite 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
World of Tanks 30−35
+154%
12−14
−154%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Dota 2 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
World of Tanks 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Valorant 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Elden Ring 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Valorant 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

This is how NVS 5400M and ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 compete in popular games:

  • NVS 5400M is 600% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the NVS 5400M is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • NVS 5400M is ahead in 27 tests (84%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.62 0.34
Recency 1 June 2012 7 January 2008
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm

NVS 5400M has a 376.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

The NVS 5400M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility FireGL V5700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 5400M
NVS 5400M
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
Mobility FireGL V5700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 47 votes

Rate NVS 5400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Mobility FireGL V5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.