UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4570 and UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) outperforms ATI Mobility HD 4570 by a whopping 917% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1290 | 723 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | no data |
GPU code name | M92 | no data |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 9 January 2009 (15 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 80 | 32 |
Core clock speed | 680 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Number of transistors | 242 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | no data |
Texture fill rate | 5.440 | no data |
Floating-point processing power | 0.1088 TFLOPS | no data |
ROPs | 4 | no data |
TMUs | 8 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | MXM-II | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR3 | no data |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | no data |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | no data |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | no data |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12_1 |
Shader Model | 4.1 | no data |
OpenGL | 3.3 | no data |
OpenCL | 1.1 | no data |
Vulkan | N/A | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- 3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 1−2
−1200%
| 13
+1200%
|
FPS performance in popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Epic Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset - 4K
Epic Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - Full HD
Epic Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−800%
|
18−20
+800%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
−233%
|
10−11
+233%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−300%
|
8−9
+300%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−800%
|
18−20
+800%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
−125%
|
9−10
+125%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
−213%
|
24−27
+213%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 4−5
−250%
|
14−16
+250%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 27−30
−46.4%
|
40−45
+46.4%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
−233%
|
10−11
+233%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−300%
|
8−9
+300%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−800%
|
18−20
+800%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
−125%
|
9−10
+125%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
−213%
|
24−27
+213%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 4−5
−225%
|
13
+225%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
−66.7%
|
14−16
+66.7%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 27−30
−46.4%
|
40−45
+46.4%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
−233%
|
10−11
+233%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−300%
|
8−9
+300%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−800%
|
18−20
+800%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
−125%
|
9−10
+125%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9
+12.5%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 4−5
−275%
|
15
+275%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
+50%
|
6
−50%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 27−30
−46.4%
|
40−45
+46.4%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Hitman 3 | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 2−3
−350%
|
9−10
+350%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
This is how ATI Mobility HD 4570 and UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is 1200% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the ATI Mobility HD 4570 is 50% faster.
- in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is 350% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- ATI Mobility HD 4570 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
- UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is ahead in 24 tests (42%)
- there's a draw in 32 tests (56%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.35 | 3.56 |
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) has a 917.1% higher aggregate performance score.
The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4570 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.