Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs GeForce 9600M GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9600M GT and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9600M GT
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 23 Watt
0.36

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms 9600M GT by a whopping 2794% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1280440
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.08no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameG96CMeteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 June 2008 (16 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores324
Core clock speed120 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1950 MHz
Number of transistors314 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Wattno data
Texture fill rate8.000no data
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12_2
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−125

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−62.5%
13
+62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−37.5%
11
+37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−900%
50
+900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−62.5%
13
+62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−243%
24
+243%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−680%
39
+680%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−520%
30−35
+520%
World of Tanks 12−14
−1046%
140−150
+1046%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−138%
18−20
+138%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−500%
40−45
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−500%
30
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Valorant 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−33.3%
20−22
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−33.3%
20−22
+33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 9−10
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Dota 2 14−16
−2567%
400−450
+2567%
Valorant 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 15
+0%
15
+0%
Elden Ring 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Elden Ring 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
World of Tanks 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Elden Ring 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 2350% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is ahead in 24 tests (43%)
  • there's a draw in 32 tests (57%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 10.42
Recency 4 June 2008 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 2794.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9600M GT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
GeForce 9600M GT
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 99 votes

Rate GeForce 9600M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 7 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.