GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 3670 and GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 3670
2008
256 MB GDDR3, 30 Watt
0.44

GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB outperforms ATI Mobility HD 3670 by a whopping 3384% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1257357
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.0113.14
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameM86GP106
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2008 (17 years ago)27 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1201280
Core clock speed680 MHz1063 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1480 MHz
Number of transistors378 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate5.440118.4
Floating-point processing power0.1632 TFLOPS3.789 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2002 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s192.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−3950%
81
+3950%
4K0−128

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−1750%
35−40
+1750%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−271%
24−27
+271%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−1750%
35−40
+1750%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−271%
24−27
+271%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1229%
93
+1229%
Valorant 27−30
−341%
110−120
+341%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−1750%
35−40
+1750%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−271%
24−27
+271%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−1193%
190−200
+1193%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Dota 2 10−12
−727%
90−95
+727%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1129%
86
+1129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1550%
66
+1550%
Valorant 27−30
−341%
110−120
+341%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−271%
24−27
+271%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Dota 2 10−12
−727%
90−95
+727%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−800%
63
+800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−775%
35
+775%
Valorant 27−30
−341%
110−120
+341%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 100−110
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−6700%
130−140
+6700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 12−14
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 30−35

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−260%
54
+260%
Valorant 3−4
−2533%
75−80
+2533%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−1900%
20
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−550%
13
+550%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 70
+0%
70
+0%
Fortnite 133
+0%
133
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Fortnite 116
+0%
116
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 84
+0%
84
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 73
+0%
73
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
+0%
24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 3670 and GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB is 3950% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB is 6700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB is ahead in 33 tests (52%)
  • there's a draw in 31 test (48%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.44 15.33
Recency 7 January 2008 27 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 80 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 3670 has 166.7% lower power consumption.

GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB, on the other hand, has a 3384.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 243.8% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 3670 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670
Mobility Radeon HD 3670
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 21 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 202 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 3670 or GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.