RTX A5500 vs Matrox QID

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated43
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data17.26
ArchitectureMP (2004)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameMP-A4GA102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date17 December 2004 (19 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data10240
Core clock speed250 MHz1080 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology0 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data230 Watt
Texture fill rate2.000532.8
Floating-point processing powerno data34.1 TFLOPS
ROPs296
TMUs8320
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Length165 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s768.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.54.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 December 2004 22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 24 GB

RTX A5500 has an age advantage of 17 years, and a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Matrox QID and RTX A5500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox QID is a desktop card while RTX A5500 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox QID
QID
NVIDIA RTX A5500
RTX A5500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox QID on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 49 votes

Rate RTX A5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.