RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Matrox Mystique G200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated37
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG200 (1998−1999)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameEclipseno data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1998 (26 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data7424
Core clock speed84 MHzno data
Number of transistors10 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology350 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate0.08no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 2xno data
Length150 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 MB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed112 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth896.0 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGAno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.012 Ultimate
OpenGLNoneno data
OpenCLNoneno data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 5 nm

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 153500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 6900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Mystique G200 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox Mystique G200 is a desktop card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Mystique G200
Mystique G200
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 11 votes

Rate Matrox Mystique G200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.