CMP 40HX vs Matrox M9125 PCIe x16

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Matrox M9125 PCIe x16 with CMP 40HX, including specs and performance data.

Matrox M9125 PCIe x16
512 MB DDR2
0.06

CMP 40HX outperforms Matrox M9125 PCIe x16 by a whopping 32133% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1469289
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data21.82
Power efficiencyno data7.16
ArchitecturePXTuring (2018−2022)
GPU code namePX-A1TU106
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data25 February 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed250 MHz1470 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistorsno data10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data185 Watt
Texture fill rate2.000237.6
Floating-point processing powerno data7.603 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs8144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mm229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x LFH60No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.54.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Matrox M9125 PCIe x16 0.06
CMP 40HX 19.34
+32133%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Matrox M9125 PCIe x16 25
CMP 40HX 7452
+29708%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.06 19.34
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 12 nm

CMP 40HX has a 32133.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

The CMP 40HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Matrox M9125 PCIe x16 in performance tests.

Be aware that Matrox M9125 PCIe x16 is a desktop card while CMP 40HX is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox M9125 PCIe x16
M9125 PCIe x16
NVIDIA CMP 40HX
CMP 40HX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2 votes

Rate Matrox M9125 PCIe x16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 55 votes

Rate CMP 40HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.