ATI Radeon 7200 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4541549
Place by popularity19not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeR100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)1 April 2000 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speedno data166 MHz
Number of transistorsno data30 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data23 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4DDR
Maximum RAM amountno data32 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data5.312 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_17.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 30−35 no data
Fortnite 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 no data
Valorant 90−95 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150 no data
Dota 2 65−70 no data
Far Cry 5 30−35 no data
Fortnite 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 18−20 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 no data
Valorant 90−95 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Dota 2 65−70 no data
Far Cry 5 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Metro Exodus 10−12 no data
Valorant 100−110 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 20−22 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 20−22 no data

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22 no data
Metro Exodus 5−6 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 no data
Valorant 50−55 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 no data
Dota 2 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 10−11 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2020 1 April 2000
Chip lithography 10 nm 180 nm

Iris Xe Graphics G7 has an age advantage of 20 years, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon 7200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook card while Radeon 7200 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
ATI Radeon 7200
Radeon 7200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 2708 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 21 vote

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe Graphics G7 or Radeon 7200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.