Radeon Vega 7 Mobile vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking618not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.75no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameDG1Cezanne
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date31 October 2020 (4 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768448
Core clock speed300 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate79.2053.20
Floating-point processing power2.534 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs4828

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR4XSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2133 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth68.26 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.21.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 October 2020 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 45 Watt

Iris Xe MAX Graphics has 80% lower power consumption.

Vega 7 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon Vega 7 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a notebook card while Radeon Vega 7 Mobile is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
AMD Radeon Vega 7 Mobile
Radeon Vega 7 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 252 votes

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 51 vote

Rate Radeon Vega 7 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.