FirePro W6150M vs FirePro W2100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W2100 with FirePro W6150M, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W2100
2014
2 GB DDR3, 26 Watt
2.34

W6150M outperforms W2100 by a whopping 161% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking840576
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.49no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameOlandSaturn
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date12 August 2014 (10 years ago)12 November 2015 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320768
Core clock speed630 MHz1075 MHz
Boost clock speed680 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Wattno data
Texture fill rate13.6051.60
Floating-point processing power0.4352 TFLOPS1.651 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2048

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8MXM-B (3.0)
Width1-slotno data
Form factorlow profile / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s88 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPortNo outputs
DisplayPort count2no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro W2100 2.34
W6150M 6.11
+161%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W2100 903
W6150M 2358
+161%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−150%
35−40
+150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Hitman 3 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−157%
95−100
+157%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Hitman 3 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−157%
95−100
+157%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Hitman 3 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−157%
95−100
+157%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Hitman 3 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

This is how FirePro W2100 and W6150M compete in popular games:

  • W6150M is 150% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.34 6.11
Recency 12 August 2014 12 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB

W6150M has a 161.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The FirePro W6150M is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W2100 is a workstation card while FirePro W6150M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W2100
FirePro W2100
AMD FirePro W6150M
FirePro W6150M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 94 votes

Rate FirePro W2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W6150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.