Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Xe MAX Graphics with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2020
4 GB LPDDR4X, 25 Watt
5.12
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
27.31
+433%

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Iris Xe MAX Graphics by a whopping 433% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking624202
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.0353.47
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDG1AD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date31 October 2020 (4 years ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682048
Core clock speed300 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate79.20129.6
Floating-point processing power2.534 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs4864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR4XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2133 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.26 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 5.12
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 27.31
+433%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 8214
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239
+146%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 6333
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136
+123%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 1743
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 5278
+203%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
−419%
140−150
+419%
1440p17
−429%
90−95
+429%
4K15
−433%
80−85
+433%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−428%
95−100
+428%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−419%
140−150
+419%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19
−426%
100−105
+426%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−428%
190−200
+428%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−422%
120−130
+422%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−428%
95−100
+428%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−419%
140−150
+419%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−431%
170−180
+431%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−426%
400−450
+426%
Hitman 3 24
−400%
120−130
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−392%
300−310
+392%
Metro Exodus 57
−426%
300−310
+426%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
−415%
170−180
+415%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−414%
190−200
+414%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−415%
350−400
+415%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−419%
140−150
+419%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6
−400%
30−33
+400%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−428%
190−200
+428%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−422%
120−130
+422%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−428%
95−100
+428%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−419%
140−150
+419%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−431%
170−180
+431%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−426%
400−450
+426%
Hitman 3 23
−422%
120−130
+422%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−392%
300−310
+392%
Metro Exodus 43
−412%
220−230
+412%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−431%
170−180
+431%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
−415%
170−180
+415%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−417%
150−160
+417%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−415%
350−400
+415%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−419%
140−150
+419%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−428%
95−100
+428%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−422%
120−130
+422%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−428%
95−100
+428%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−419%
140−150
+419%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−426%
400−450
+426%
Hitman 3 21
−424%
110−120
+424%
Horizon Zero Dawn 26
−400%
130−140
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 29
−417%
150−160
+417%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
−428%
95−100
+428%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−415%
350−400
+415%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 25
−420%
130−140
+420%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−400%
110−120
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−429%
90−95
+429%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−400%
65−70
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−419%
280−290
+419%
Hitman 3 14−16
−400%
70−75
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−422%
120−130
+422%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−428%
95−100
+428%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20
−400%
100−105
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−386%
350−400
+386%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−419%
270−280
+419%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−400%
55−60
+400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−433%
80−85
+433%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
−400%
55−60
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%

This is how Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 419% faster in 1080p
  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 429% faster in 1440p
  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 433% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.12 27.31
Recency 31 October 2020 26 February 2024
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt

Iris Xe MAX Graphics has 40% lower power consumption.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 433.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe MAX Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 257 votes

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 18 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.