RTX A4500 Embedded vs Iris Xe Graphics 80EU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated195
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data24.49
ArchitectureGeneration 12.2 (2022−2023)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameAlder Lake GT1GA104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6405888
Core clock speed300 MHz510 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1215 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate52.00223.6
Floating-point processing power1.664 TFLOPS14.31 TFLOPS
ROPs2096
TMUs40184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2022 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 10 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 80 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics 80EU has 77.8% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500 Embedded, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics 80EU and RTX A4500 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics 80EU is a desktop card while RTX A4500 Embedded is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
RTX A4500 Embedded

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 156 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 80EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX A4500 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.