Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) outperforms Iris Pro Graphics P580 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 618 | 611 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 24.01 | 14.90 |
Architecture | Generation 9.0 (2015−2016) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
GPU code name | Skylake GT4e | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 1 September 2015 (9 years ago) | 28 May 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 576 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Number of transistors | 189 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm+ | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 12-25 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 75.60 | no data |
Floating-point processing power | 1.21 TFLOPS | no data |
ROPs | 9 | no data |
TMUs | 72 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | Ring Bus | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | no data |
Memory bus width | System Shared | no data |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | no data |
Shared memory | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Quick Sync | + | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_1 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
OpenCL | 3.0 | no data |
Vulkan | 1.3 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 16−18
−6.3%
| 17
+6.3%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12
+9.1%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16
+66.7%
|
9
−66.7%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
−9.1%
|
35−40
+9.1%
|
Hitman 3 | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
−6.1%
|
35−40
+6.1%
|
Metro Exodus | 12−14
−38.5%
|
18
+38.5%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
+16.7%
|
12
−16.7%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 18−20
−5.3%
|
20−22
+5.3%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 45−50
−17%
|
55
+17%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−12
+0%
|
11
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16
+275%
|
4
−275%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
−9.1%
|
35−40
+9.1%
|
Hitman 3 | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
−6.1%
|
35−40
+6.1%
|
Metro Exodus | 12−14
−7.7%
|
14
+7.7%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
+55.6%
|
9
−55.6%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 18−20
+11.8%
|
17
−11.8%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
−5.6%
|
18−20
+5.6%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 45−50
−8.5%
|
51
+8.5%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
−9.1%
|
35−40
+9.1%
|
Hitman 3 | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
+200%
|
11
−200%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 18−20
+26.7%
|
15
−26.7%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
+100%
|
9
−100%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 45−50
−2.1%
|
45−50
+2.1%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
−15.4%
|
14−16
+15.4%
|
Hitman 3 | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35
−6.1%
|
35−40
+6.1%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Hitman 3 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10
−22.2%
|
10−12
+22.2%
|
Metro Exodus | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 0−1 | 0−1 |
This is how Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compete in popular games:
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 6% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Pro Graphics P580 is 275% faster.
- in Hitman 3, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 100% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is ahead in 8 tests (12%)
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is ahead in 38 tests (56%)
- there's a draw in 22 tests (32%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 5.25 | 5.43 |
Recency | 1 September 2015 | 28 May 2019 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 12 Watt |
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) has a 3.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU).
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.