GeForce RTX 4060 vs Iris Pro Graphics 580

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Pro Graphics 580 with GeForce RTX 4060, including specs and performance data.

Iris Pro Graphics 580
2015
64 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
4.77

RTX 4060 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 580 by a whopping 981% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking64149
Place by popularitynot in top-1002
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data100.00
Power efficiency22.1731.25
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameSkylake GT4eAD107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)18 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5763072
Core clock speed350 MHz1830 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz2460 MHz
Number of transistors189 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate68.40236.2
Floating-point processing power1.094 TFLOPS15.11 TFLOPS
ROPs948
TMUs7296
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data240 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 GB8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data272.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Pro Graphics 580 4.77
RTX 4060 51.56
+981%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Pro Graphics 580 1841
RTX 4060 19887
+980%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Iris Pro Graphics 580 3220
RTX 4060 38191
+1086%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Iris Pro Graphics 580 1903
RTX 4060 28111
+1377%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Pro Graphics 580 14594
RTX 4060 156140
+970%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Pro Graphics 580 184880
RTX 4060 769721
+316%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−711%
146
+711%
1440p6−7
−1133%
74
+1133%
4K4−5
−1050%
46
+1050%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.05
1440pno data4.04
4Kno data6.50

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1638%
139
+1638%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−715%
100−110
+715%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−1660%
85−90
+1660%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−1250%
160−170
+1250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−890%
95−100
+890%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1238%
107
+1238%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−920%
100−110
+920%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−846%
120−130
+846%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−613%
210−220
+613%
Hitman 3 10−11
−980%
100−110
+980%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−542%
190−200
+542%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−1236%
140−150
+1236%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−723%
100−110
+723%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1059%
190−200
+1059%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−209%
140−150
+209%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−715%
100−110
+715%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−1660%
85−90
+1660%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−1250%
160−170
+1250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−890%
95−100
+890%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1025%
90
+1025%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−920%
100−110
+920%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−846%
120−130
+846%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−613%
210−220
+613%
Hitman 3 10−11
−980%
100−110
+980%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−542%
190−200
+542%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−1236%
140−150
+1236%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−723%
100−110
+723%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1176%
217
+1176%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−518%
100−110
+518%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−209%
140−150
+209%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−715%
100−110
+715%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−1660%
85−90
+1660%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−890%
95−100
+890%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−900%
80
+900%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−920%
100−110
+920%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−613%
210−220
+613%
Hitman 3 10−11
−980%
100−110
+980%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−542%
190−200
+542%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1018%
190
+1018%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−559%
112
+559%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−209%
140−150
+209%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−723%
100−110
+723%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−1056%
100−110
+1056%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−1014%
75−80
+1014%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1325%
55−60
+1325%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2300%
48
+2300%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1080%
55−60
+1080%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−2500%
260−270
+2500%
Hitman 3 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−964%
110−120
+964%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−5450%
111
+5450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1925%
80−85
+1925%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−630%
210−220
+630%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−878%
85−90
+878%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−1700%
50−55
+1700%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1433%
45−50
+1433%
Hitman 3 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−4060%
200−210
+4060%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−6900%
70−75
+6900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−6700%
68
+6700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1133%
35−40
+1133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 20
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1500%
30−35
+1500%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1750%
70−75
+1750%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−2700%
27−30
+2700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−860%
45−50
+860%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 129
+0%
129
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70
+0%
70
+0%

This is how Iris Pro Graphics 580 and RTX 4060 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 is 711% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 is 1133% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 is 1050% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4060 is 6900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 is ahead in 68 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.77 51.56
Recency 1 September 2015 18 May 2023
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 115 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics 580 has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 666.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060, on the other hand, has a 980.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics 580 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4060 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
Iris Pro Graphics 580
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 17 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 17181 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.