Radeon RX 580 2048SP vs GeForce GTX 765M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 765M with Radeon RX 580 2048SP, including specs and performance data.

GTX 765M
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
5.18

RX 580 2048SP outperforms GTX 765M by a whopping 285% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking619276
Place by popularitynot in top-10052
Power efficiency4.739.11
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGK106Polaris 20
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)15 October 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682048
Core clock speed850 MHz1168 MHz
Boost clock speed863 MHz1284 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate55.23164.4
Floating-point processing power1.326 TFLOPS5.259 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs64128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI++
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 765M 5.18
RX 580 2048SP 19.93
+285%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 765M 1997
RX 580 2048SP 7681
+285%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p51
−273%
190−200
+273%
Full HD39
−285%
150−160
+285%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−264%
120−130
+264%
Hitman 3 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−264%
120−130
+264%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−261%
65−70
+261%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−283%
180−190
+283%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−264%
120−130
+264%
Hitman 3 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−264%
120−130
+264%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−261%
65−70
+261%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−261%
65−70
+261%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−283%
180−190
+283%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−264%
120−130
+264%
Hitman 3 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−264%
120−130
+264%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−261%
65−70
+261%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−261%
65−70
+261%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−283%
180−190
+283%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Hitman 3 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−264%
120−130
+264%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Hitman 3 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%

This is how GTX 765M and RX 580 2048SP compete in popular games:

  • RX 580 2048SP is 273% faster in 900p
  • RX 580 2048SP is 285% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.18 19.93
Recency 30 May 2013 15 October 2018
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 150 Watt

GTX 765M has 100% lower power consumption.

RX 580 2048SP, on the other hand, has a 284.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 580 2048SP is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 765M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 765M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 580 2048SP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GeForce GTX 765M
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Radeon RX 580 2048SP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 74 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 765M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3166 votes

Rate Radeon RX 580 2048SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.