Radeon 620 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

Place in the ranking	605	845
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	14.99	3.21
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code name	Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11	Polaris 24
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	28 May 2019 (5 years ago)	13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	64	384
Core clock speed	300 MHz	730 MHz
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1024 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12-25 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	24.58
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	8
TMUs	no data	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR4	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	no data	2 GB
Memory bus width	no data	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	no data	6.3
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.0
Vulkan	-	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 5.41
+133%

Radeon 620 2.32

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 2743
+58.6%

Radeon 620 1730

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

17
+143%

7−8

−143%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10
+80%

5−6

−80%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Far Cry 5	12 +200%	4−5 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	9 +50%	6−7 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +227%	10−12 −227%
Hitman 3	12−14 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +84.2%	18−20 −84.2%
Metro Exodus	18 +1700%	1−2 −1700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12 +140%	5−6 −140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 +81.8%	10−12 −81.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55 +48.6%	35−40 −48.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Far Cry 5	11 +175%	4−5 −175%
Far Cry New Dawn	4 −50%	6−7 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +227%	10−12 −227%
Hitman 3	12−14 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +84.2%	18−20 −84.2%
Metro Exodus	14 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9 +80%	5−6 −80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	17 +54.5%	10−12 −54.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +46.2%	12−14 −46.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	51 +37.8%	35−40 −37.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +227%	10−12 −227%
Hitman 3	12−14 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	11 −72.7%	18−20 +72.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	15 +36.4%	10−12 −36.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9 −44.4%	12−14 +44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +29.7%	35−40 −29.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16
+200%

5−6

−200%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Hitman 3	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +169%	12−14 −169%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11
+100%

5−6

−100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Hitman 3	2−3	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Metro Exodus	2−3	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
+100%

3−4

−100%

This is how Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and Radeon 620 compete in popular games:

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 143% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 1700% faster.
in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 620 is 73% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is ahead in 53 tests (95%)
Radeon 620 is ahead in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.41	2.32
Chip lithography	10 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12 Watt	50 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) has a 133.2% higher aggregate performance score, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 620 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.