GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Iris Plus Graphics 650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Plus Graphics 650 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Iris Plus Graphics 650
2017
32 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
4.55

RTX 3060 Ti outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 650 by a whopping 1067% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking64848
Place by popularitynot in top-10021
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data70.13
Power efficiency21.9119.18
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT3eGA104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)1 December 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844864
Core clock speed300 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors189 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate55.20253.1
Floating-point processing power0.8832 TFLOPS16.2 TFLOPS
ROPs680
TMUs48152
Tensor Coresno data152
Ray Tracing Coresno data38

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 4.55
RTX 3060 Ti 53.11
+1067%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 1757
RTX 3060 Ti 20496
+1067%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 2762
RTX 3060 Ti 37941
+1274%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 1698
RTX 3060 Ti 28145
+1558%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 13153
RTX 3060 Ti 153968
+1071%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 161538
RTX 3060 Ti 615311
+281%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
−590%
145
+590%
1440p6−7
−1250%
81
+1250%
4K4−5
−1150%
50
+1150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−938%
83
+938%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−831%
121
+831%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−2275%
95
+2275%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−1436%
160−170
+1436%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−930%
100−110
+930%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−913%
81
+913%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−950%
100−110
+950%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−892%
120−130
+892%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−679%
210−220
+679%
Hitman 3 10−11
−1020%
110−120
+1020%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−587%
200−210
+587%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−1390%
140−150
+1390%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−817%
110−120
+817%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1129%
200−210
+1129%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−220%
140−150
+220%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−1408%
196
+1408%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1925%
81
+1925%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−1436%
160−170
+1436%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−930%
100−110
+930%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−875%
78
+875%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−950%
100−110
+950%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−892%
120−130
+892%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−679%
210−220
+679%
Hitman 3 10−11
−1020%
110−120
+1020%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−587%
200−210
+587%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−1390%
140−150
+1390%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−817%
110−120
+817%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1029%
192
+1029%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−220%
140−150
+220%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−477%
75
+477%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1750%
74
+1750%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−930%
100−110
+930%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−863%
77
+863%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−950%
100−110
+950%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−518%
173
+518%
Hitman 3 10−11
−1020%
110−120
+1020%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−367%
140
+367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−924%
174
+924%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−441%
92
+441%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−71.1%
77
+71.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−817%
110−120
+817%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−1071%
80−85
+1071%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1525%
65
+1525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1475%
60−65
+1475%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2500%
52
+2500%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1140%
60−65
+1140%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−3213%
260−270
+3213%
Hitman 3 9−10
−722%
70−75
+722%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−1040%
114
+1040%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−9200%
93
+9200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−2075%
85−90
+2075%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−782%
247
+782%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1038%
90−95
+1038%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−1833%
55−60
+1833%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1533%
45−50
+1533%
Hitman 3 1−2
−5600%
57
+5600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−5200%
210−220
+5200%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 77

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1400%
45
+1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1900%
40
+1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1750%
35−40
+1750%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 25
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1600%
30−35
+1600%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3333%
103
+3333%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−3200%
33
+3200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−920%
50−55
+920%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
+0%
60
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 139
+0%
139
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 84
+0%
84
+0%

This is how Iris Plus Graphics 650 and RTX 3060 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 Ti is 590% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3060 Ti is 1250% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3060 Ti is 1150% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3060 Ti is 9200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 Ti is ahead in 67 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.55 53.11
Recency 3 January 2017 1 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 200 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 650 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 1233.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 3060 Ti, on the other hand, has a 1067.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics 650 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Plus Graphics 650
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 98 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 15027 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.