Radeon Pro 5600M vs Iris Plus Graphics 640

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Plus Graphics 640 with Radeon Pro 5600M, including specs and performance data.

Iris Plus Graphics 640
2017
32 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
3.86

Pro 5600M outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 640 by a whopping 521% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking703233
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.6432.85
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT3eNavi 12
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)15 June 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842560
Core clock speed300 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1030 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate52.80164.8
Floating-point processing power0.8448 TFLOPS5.274 TFLOPS
ROPs664
TMUs48160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4HBM2
Maximum RAM amount32 GB8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared2048 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared770 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data394.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Plus Graphics 640 3.86
Pro 5600M 23.96
+521%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Plus Graphics 640 1489
Pro 5600M 9232
+520%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD22
−491%
130−140
+491%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−457%
35−40
+457%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−373%
50−55
+373%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−875%
75−80
+875%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−444%
45−50
+444%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−457%
35−40
+457%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−473%
60−65
+473%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−513%
140−150
+513%
Hitman 3 9−10
−433%
45−50
+433%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−311%
110−120
+311%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−1071%
80−85
+1071%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−530%
60−65
+530%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−440%
80−85
+440%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−140%
100−110
+140%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−373%
50−55
+373%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−875%
75−80
+875%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−444%
45−50
+444%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−457%
35−40
+457%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−473%
60−65
+473%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−513%
140−150
+513%
Hitman 3 9−10
−433%
45−50
+433%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−311%
110−120
+311%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−1071%
80−85
+1071%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−530%
60−65
+530%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−440%
80−85
+440%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−225%
50−55
+225%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−140%
100−110
+140%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−373%
50−55
+373%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−444%
45−50
+444%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−457%
35−40
+457%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−513%
140−150
+513%
Hitman 3 9−10
−433%
45−50
+433%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−311%
110−120
+311%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−440%
80−85
+440%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−1200%
50−55
+1200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−140%
100−110
+140%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−530%
60−65
+530%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−500%
35−40
+500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−733%
24−27
+733%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−600%
27−30
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3300%
130−140
+3300%
Hitman 3 8−9
−250%
27−30
+250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−444%
45−50
+444%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−867%
27−30
+867%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−467%
130−140
+467%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
Metro Exodus 0−1 27−30

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 6−7
Far Cry 5 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1550%
30−35
+1550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Pro 5600M compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M is 491% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5600M is 3300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M is ahead in 63 tests (90%)
  • there's a draw in 7 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.86 23.96
Recency 3 January 2017 15 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 640 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

Pro 5600M, on the other hand, has a 520.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics 640 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Plus Graphics 640
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 310 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 77 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.