Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs HD Graphics 400
Aggregate performance score
We've compared HD Graphics 400 with Iris Xe Graphics MAX, including specs and performance data.
Iris Xe Graphics MAX outperforms HD Graphics 400 by a whopping 352% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1073 | 620 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 13.09 | 14.21 |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 (2014−2015) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) |
| GPU code name | Braswell GT1 | DG1 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 April 2015 (9 years ago) | 31 October 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 320 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 600 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 189 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 7.200 | 79.20 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.1152 TFLOPS | 2.534 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 2 | 24 |
| TMUs | 12 | 48 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Width | no data | IGP |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3L | LPDDR4X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 4.3 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 68.26 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.2 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.13 | 5.11 |
| Recency | 1 April 2015 | 31 October 2020 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 25 Watt |
HD Graphics 400 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 316.7% lower power consumption.
Iris Xe Graphics MAX, on the other hand, has a 352.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 in performance tests.
Be aware that HD Graphics 400 is a notebook card while Iris Xe Graphics MAX is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
