RTX A2000 vs HD Graphics 2500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 2500 with RTX A2000, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 2500
2012
0.69

RTX A2000 outperforms HD Graphics 2500 by a whopping 5058% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1167136
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data85.86
Power efficiencyno data35.21
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1GA106
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2012 (12 years ago)10 August 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores483328
Core clock speed650 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors392 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown70 Watt
Texture fill rate6.900124.8
Floating-point processing power0.1104 TFLOPS7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs148
TMUs6104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data167 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.801.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 2500 0.69
RTX A2000 35.59
+5058%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD Graphics 2500 351
RTX A2000 19978
+5600%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD Graphics 2500 1931
RTX A2000 76281
+3851%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD Graphics 2500 318
RTX A2000 14934
+4596%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD Graphics 2500 2605
RTX A2000 94407
+3525%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7
−1271%
96
+1271%
1440p0−146
4K0−129

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.68
1440pno data9.76
4Kno data15.48

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4900%
150−160
+4900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−4900%
200−210
+4900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−4900%
150−160
+4900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4900%
150−160
+4900%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−4900%
250−260
+4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−4900%
550−600
+4900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−4900%
300−310
+4900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−4900%
1500−1550
+4900%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−4900%
200−210
+4900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−4900%
150−160
+4900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4900%
150−160
+4900%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−4900%
250−260
+4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−4900%
550−600
+4900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−4900%
300−310
+4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−4900%
500−550
+4900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−4900%
1500−1550
+4900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−4900%
200−210
+4900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−4900%
150−160
+4900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4900%
150−160
+4900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−4900%
250−260
+4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−4900%
550−600
+4900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−4900%
300−310
+4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−4900%
500−550
+4900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−4900%
1500−1550
+4900%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
Hitman 3 6−7
−4900%
300−310
+4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−4900%
150−160
+4900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−4900%
150−160
+4900%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%

This is how HD Graphics 2500 and RTX A2000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 is 1271% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.69 35.59
Recency 1 April 2012 10 August 2021
Chip lithography 22 nm 8 nm

RTX A2000 has a 5058% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 175% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2500 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 2500 is a desktop card while RTX A2000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 2500
HD Graphics 2500
NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1333 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 558 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.