RTX A2000 vs HD Graphics 4600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 4600 with RTX A2000, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 4600
2013
45 Watt
1.84

RTX A2000 outperforms HD Graphics 4600 by a whopping 1835% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking876127
Place by popularity41not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0919.11
ArchitectureGen. 7.5 Haswell (2012−2013)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2GA106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)10 August 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449
Current price$464 $567 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX A2000 has 21133% better value for money than HD Graphics 4600.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores203328
Core clock speed200 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors392 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate27.00124.8
Floating-point performance50 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 4600 and RTX A2000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared12 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.801.3
CUDAno data8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 4600 1.84
RTX A2000 35.61
+1835%

RTX A2000 outperforms HD Graphics 4600 by 1835% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics 4600 710
RTX A2000 13751
+1837%

RTX A2000 outperforms HD Graphics 4600 by 1837% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p14
−1829%
270−280
+1829%
Full HD11
−1809%
210−220
+1809%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 4−5

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 3−4
Battlefield 5 0−1 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 5−6
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 4−5
Far Cry 5 0−1 3−4
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 5−6
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 6−7
Hitman 3 0−1 4−5
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 16−18
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 6
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 10−11
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 12−14

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 3−4
Battlefield 5 0−1 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 5−6
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 4−5
Far Cry 5 0−1 3−4
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 5−6
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 6−7
Hitman 3 0−1 4−5
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 16−18
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 4−5
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 10−11
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 4
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 12−14

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 3−4
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 5−6
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 4−5
Far Cry 5 0−1 3−4
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 6−7
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 16−18
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 10−11
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 5−6
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 12−14

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 4−5

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 3−4
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 2−3

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 4−5
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 0−1 3−4
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 2−3
Hitman 3 0−1 7−8
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 6−7
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 1−2
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 5−6

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 1−2
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 2−3

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 2−3
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 1−2
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 2−3
Metro Exodus 0−1 4−5
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 3−4

This is how HD Graphics 4600 and RTX A2000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 is 1829% faster in 900p
  • RTX A2000 is 1809% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.84 35.61
Recency 1 June 2013 10 August 2021
Chip lithography 22 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 70 Watt

The RTX A2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4600 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4600 is a notebook card while RTX A2000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4600
HD Graphics 4600
NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 2181 vote

Rate HD Graphics 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 520 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.