GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs HD Graphics 2000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 2000 and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 2000
2011
0.55

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms HD Graphics 2000 by a whopping 3307% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1219298
Place by popularitynot in top-10017
Power efficiencyno data28.64
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT1GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)17 December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482048
Core clock speed850 MHz1185 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1477 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown45 Watt
Texture fill rate8.10094.53
Floating-point processing power0.1296 TFLOPS6.05 TFLOPS
ROPs132
TMUs664
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 2000 0.55
RTX 2050 Mobile 18.74
+3307%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD Graphics 2000 896
RTX 2050 Mobile 46821
+5128%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11
−282%
42
+282%
1440p0−133
4K0−125

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−300%
36
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2350%
49
+2350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−233%
30
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−950%
21
+950%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1167%
76
+1167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−780%
40−45
+780%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−200%
27
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−650%
15
+650%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−900%
70
+900%
Fortnite 0−1 100−105
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−950%
63
+950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1500%
120−130
+1500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−780%
40−45
+780%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1060%
55−60
+1060%
World of Tanks 16−18
−1294%
220−230
+1294%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−267%
30−35
+267%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−550%
13
+550%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−814%
60−65
+814%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−833%
56
+833%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1500%
120−130
+1500%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−5467%
160−170
+5467%
World of Tanks 1−2
−12700%
120−130
+12700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1125%
45−50
+1125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1150%
24−27
+1150%
Valorant 5−6
−860%
45−50
+860%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−113%
30−35
+113%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−113%
30−35
+113%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−5500%
55−60
+5500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−113%
30−35
+113%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 18−20
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Dota 2 14−16
−127%
34
+127%
Valorant 1−2
−2100%
21−24
+2100%

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring 43
+0%
43
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 87
+0%
87
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Dota 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Elden Ring 59
+0%
59
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 69
+0%
69
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 43
+0%
43
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Dota 2 110
+0%
110
+0%
Valorant 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 37
+0%
37
+0%
Elden Ring 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 47
+0%
47
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Elden Ring 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 2000 and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 282% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in World of Tanks, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 12700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 33 tests (54%)
  • there's a draw in 28 tests (46%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.55 18.74
Recency 1 February 2011 17 December 2021
Chip lithography 32 nm 8 nm

RTX 2050 Mobile has a 3307.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 2000
HD Graphics 2000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1354 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2329 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.